
"This is not as fanciful as it may seem," said Eliot Jacobson, an Ohio
University mathematician, in a posting on the internet.
"We believe the meteor impact theory deserves more considered attention,"
wrote physicist Charles Hailey and astronomer David Helfand, both from
Columbia University, in a letter to The New York Times. Based on the
fact that about 3,000 meteors large enough to bring down an airliner strike
the Earth every day, they calculated a one-in-ten chance that a commercial
flight would be knocked down by a meteoric impact.
"The statistics-based theory that a meteor could have hit TWA Flight 800 is
not difficult to support," noted Michael Epley, a computer programmer, in a
follow-up letter to The New York Times.
There is actually considerable eyewitness support for the meteoric theory.
More than a hundred people on the Long Island shoreline reported seeing an
unusual streak of light in the sky just before the crash. And meteorites
are known to strike man-made objects--houses and cars, so why not an
airliner? Now that the investigators have considered every possible
explanation for the crash and failed to find an answer, perhaps it's time
they look to the "impossible."
As the search for pieces of TWA Flight 800 comes to an end, the reason
behind the July 17th crash remains elusive. The evidence gathered by
investigators has failed to pin the cause on a bomb, a missile, or a
mechanical malfunction. So people are beginning to look beyond these three
theories of blame. One that's causing spirited discussion both on the
internet and in newspapers lately is that Flight 800 was the victim of a
freak event--a meteor impact.